MauW4r3 / anymemo

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/anymemo
GNU General Public License v2.0
0 stars 1 forks source link

Review Folder / Multiple Review #116

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
--Requested to post here from email.

What is the feature you want?
A option to review an entire folder, including all of the databases within it. 
As well as the ability to go into the folder and 'checkmark' specific databases 
to review.

How important is it to you?
I wouldn't say that it's a required feature, yet I feel that it would be a time 
saver. Currently you have to open a database to study, and then close and open 
another one to study the next, with this feature you can save time by studying 
a whole folder or multiple databases.

Do you think other people also want this feature and why?
Yes, someone had suggested a 'similar' feature utilizing categories.
Link:
http://code.google.com/p/anymemo/issues/detail?id=104

However, I feel this method is more useful because it allows for better 
organization then just creating cards with different categories. Here's an 
example of a hierarchical structure that could be created with this system.

(Quoted from a previous message, so tenses and the use of I might seem off)..

"What I mean is that I can put Deck.1 and Deck.2 in Category.A; by doing so I 
can learn both Deck.1 and Deck.2 just be selecting to practice on Category.A.

This can system can also create 'grandparent' relations, not only parent-child. 
In this sense, we have Deck.3 and Deck.4 in Category.B. With Category.A and 
Category.B residing under 'Homework.' As such I can then select to review 
'Homework,' Category.A, Category.B, Deck.1, Deck.2, Deck.3, or Deck.4, 
depending on what I feel I need to study."

Original issue reported on code.google.com by googoo1...@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2012 at 5:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Thank you for posting your suggestion here. As I have said this is not easy 
feature to implement. But if there are enough demand, I will consider it in a 
major revision. 

Original comment by mrlhwlib...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2012 at 3:00