Closed helhum closed 7 years ago
I think i would go for an approach with a base folder so the root of the bucket is not managed by FAL, but besides that I think excluding one ore two folders could be helpful in some cases.
One thing that concerns me is the user, what happens is a user tries to create a folder that matches an excluded path? And what if the user doesn't understand why a certain folder isn't visible after creating? How should we reflect this kind of settings in our documentation?
The user will get the feedback that the folder cannot be created anyway. you do not consider this enough?
I think i would go for an approach with a base folder so the root of the bucket is not managed by FAL well in my case the bucket is there and it contains a folder structure that cannot be changed, as this bucket is also used elsewhere
And what if the user doesn't understand why a certain folder isn't visible after creating
It is about folders, that are already in the storage. I think it is administrators task to not exclude folders that aren't present already.
cool! thanks for the merge
It is useful to exclude some folders from TYPO3 even if present in S3