Open wang-kangkang opened 3 years ago
@wang-kangkang please see the link to get easy, medium, hard reuslts.
我就是照着这个做的,才得到上面没easy-medium-hard的这种结果,能再说详细些吗?你是说跑那个matlab代码吗? i was did by your link, and than get my result. can you be more specific? you mean the matlab code in eval_tools?
@wang-kangkang Yes, you need to run the official matlab code in eval_tools to get results.
@wang-kangkang Yes, you need to run the official matlab code in eval_tools to get results.
thank you. i have another question. the result in wider_val hard is 0.934 or 0.924 in picture, but the result in wider_val hard is 0.930 or 0.922 in table. why are they different?
@wang-kangkang The results in table are without TTA and the results in picture are our final score with TTA.
@wang-kangkang The results in table are without TTA and the results in picture are our final score with TTA.
thank you I have the third question. in test_widerface.py, i find the third param in build_dataloader() need to be 0, if use 1 by default, it will report segment fault. do you know why? the time of predict all Wider_val need almost 2 hours
@wang-kangkang We haven't meet the error.
跑tinaface的评测,只有voc的ap,没有easy,medium,hard的结果: +-------+-------+----------+--------+-------+ | class | gts | dets | recall | ap | +-------+-------+----------+--------+-------+ | face | 31957 | 65363592 | 0.995 | 0.916 | +-------+-------+----------+--------+-------+ | mAP | | | | 0.916 | +-------+-------+----------+--------+-------+ 我想要easy medium hard的结果该怎么弄?