Closed OllyGilbert closed 7 years ago
@OllyGilbert do we need to handle the case where the user enters multiple urls?
@olizilla good point. In this instance let's show a smart embed for the first url given, but display all the urls in the user comment
This is how facebook does it:
@OllyGilbert The properties
og:image
article:published_time
og:title
will be displayed if available. Some or all of them may not be found in the source document.
For example http://www.wired.co.uk/article/nintendo-switch-no-save-data-transfer has no article:published_time
property.
@olizilla understood!
This is implemented now. To confirm
When a smart embed is displayed in a coverage post in an activity feed, the url concerned is hidden from the user's comment is not implemented, but rather it is left "facebook style" and the urls are in the copy as well embeding the preview of the first one.
Auto linking the urls is a separate issue that should be tackled as part of making the inputs support basic markdown, for bold, italic and autolinking of urls
Fixed in #369
@olizilla can we remove the loading indicator from the log feedback/coverage input field so that user's don't hang around if the smart embed is never going to arrive
[ ] The following information is displayed in the smart embed:
og:image
article:published_time
og:title
[ ] When a smart embed is displayed in a coverage post in an activity feed, the url concerned is hidden from the user's comment