Cross-platform support - Githubissues

MedicalUltrasound / Image3dAPI

Interface for loading 3D ultrasound data

Other

49 stars 17 forks source link

Cross-platform support #3

Open forderud opened 8 years ago

forderud commented 8 years ago

Image3dAPI is currently Windows-only. This might become a problem.

TASK:

Investigate API alternatives to COM for non-Windows platforms.

DESIRED PROPERTIES:

C++ interface headers generated based on IDL files.
Compiler-independent binary interface (ABI).
Ability to run transparently either in-process (for performance) or out-of-process (for segregation/sandboxing).
Support transfer of image data ownership across API (to avoid copying).

forderud commented 6 years ago

Possible solution: https://github.com/forderud/public/tree/master/nonwin-com . It satisfies all the desired properties, except for out-of-process marshaling.

TheHubbit commented 6 years ago

Hi Fredrik, everyone, I'm also concerned about (unhappy with?) the Windows only COM based interface. I'd prefer using a C style interface with primitive types that can be loaded (in-process) dynamically. The reason for this is that it seems to have the most universal support among platforms and languages (e.g. .NET PInvoke, Python ctypes). What do you think? Any general concerns before starting to look into it?

Best, Thomas

forderud commented 6 years ago

@TheHubbit If you take a look at the TestPython and TestViewer sample projects, then you'll see that Image3dAPI already support interoperability against .NET and Python. This works out-of-the-box, without the need for maintaining any language wrappers.

Some nice properties when accessing COM interfaces from "managed" languages like .NET and Pyton:

COM interfaces & datastructures appear like regular types in .NET & Python.
HRESULT error-codes are automatically translated to exceptions.
[retval] method arguments are automatically translated to return-values.

TheHubbit commented 6 years ago

Thanks for getting back and pointing to the TestPython and TestViewer examples! I looked at the example and agree with the benefits of COM you’ve highlighted. The reason I brought up C style interfaces was in the context of cross platform support, namely not being restricted to Windows operating system.