Closed MelindaShore closed 8 years ago
This could use more discussion. I don't think we should rule it out, if there are ways server operators can make intelligent decisions about the periodic intervals for their environment that don't violate TTLs etc. I'll tweak the text a bit to mention this explicitly.
I think the current text sufficiently addresses this.
From Viktor:
"In Section 5, the server MUST not violate DNS TTLs. The last senetence:
is I fear too much rope. Sure the server can periodically flush its cache (using shorter than possible TTLs), but this does not free it of the obligation to not extend TTLs by relying exclusively on a cache lifetime of its own choosing."