MelvorIdle / melvoridle.github.io

128 stars 21 forks source link

[Bug]: <Void Wisp Cost Reduction> #4695

Open psychoman16 opened 1 week ago

psychoman16 commented 1 week ago

Describe the bug

Various sources of cost reduction do not reduce the cost of void essence for Void Wisp summoning tablets. This bug with cost reduction seems to apply to other abyssal tablets as well.

Reproduction Steps

No response

Expected behaviour

Changing cost reduction equipment/potions will change the amount of materials required to craft (excluding shards)

Save Link - Required if issue occurs with a save

No response

Screenshots

No response

Console output

No response

Which platforms are you experiencing this bug on?

Which expansions are purchased and active at the time of the bug?

Which version of the game are you experiencing this bug on?

v1.3.1

Game Subversion

?11975

Are you using any mods?

No

SolidKalium commented 1 week ago

What is the cost it is stuck at? The full cost is 250 Void Essence, so after the max discount of 80% it should stop decreasing once it reaches 50 essence.

I believe the issue is that not all cost reduction sources show in the cost reduction list when there are ingredients with separate cost reduction factors, which makes it look like you haven't hit the cost reduction cap for an ingredient even when you have.

Related: #4626 #4461

psychoman16 commented 5 days ago

That’s it exactly, sorry for my error. I couldn’t get the cost reduction list to change regardless of the equipment I swapped out. Looks like it is maxed out on the summoning tablets I was checking. Thank you On Nov 6, 2024, at 5:16 PM, SolidKalium @.***> wrote: What is the cost it is stuck at? The full cost is 250 Void Essence, so after the max discount of 80% it should stop decreasing once it reaches 50 essence. I believe the issue is that not all cost reduction sources show in the cost reduction list when there are ingredients with separate cost reduction factors, which makes it look like you haven't hit the cost reduction cap for an ingredient even when you have. Related: #4626 #4461

—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>