Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Forgot to say: I'm using Ubuntu Intrepid and Filebrowserapplet 0.6.0.
Original comment by nordlich...@googlemail.com
on 15 Nov 2008 at 11:14
mmm... yeah. I only look at the exec bit to determine if a file is executable. I
don't really want to keep track of a large number of possibly-executable content
types instead or in addition to the exec bit.
Any ideas? Damn FAT32.
Original comment by bertol...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2008 at 11:40
Sorry, I was wrong. Of course I was, FAT don't supports Unix-Flags. The Folder
is on
an EXT3 Partition. The Filebrowserapplet is the only App that has Problems with
this.
Maybe it would be possible to add an Option for the behavior of the Applet in
such
Situations and let the User decide how to handle? Eventually for different
Filetypes
of choice.
Original comment by nordlich...@googlemail.com
on 17 Nov 2008 at 3:41
[deleted comment]
I thought about having a "run or open" dialog popup on exec files, but decided
it
would be clumsy. Maybe I will have to check the content type... Boo.
a.
Original comment by bertol...@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2008 at 3:53
Wouldn't it be easier to overtake the dafault mime setting from the system?
Original comment by nordlich...@googlemail.com
on 18 Nov 2008 at 7:01
Not sure what you mean by overtake the default mime setting? The mime system
does not
automatically run executable scripts. That's something I have to determine.
Currently
I'm only using the exec, but maybe I should look at the content type too...
Original comment by bertol...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2008 at 3:38
Well, conveniently, gio has a g_content_type_can_be_executable function. That
guy
think of everything...
Fixed in trunk. Will close on next release.
Original comment by bertol...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2008 at 1:51
Original comment by bertol...@gmail.com
on 5 Jan 2009 at 12:18
Closing...
Original comment by bertol...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2009 at 11:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nordlich...@googlemail.com
on 15 Nov 2008 at 11:12