These are the tasks that are not assigned to other issues (i.e. not simple proofing stuff)
Review one comments
[x] I find the text a bit repetitive. Try to remove some ideas that are mentioned twice.
[x] Page 16. In general, confounders are not properly defined. This is unclear.
[x] Page 16. The definition of "I" and three types of "I" is unclear. How is this used later in the text?
[ ] The bibliography list is not homgeneous.
[x] The authors should mention how to cope with the risk of finding errors in the data, having solid data for such a project is not only related the presence of missing data.
- [ ] The quality of preparation of this manuscript should increase. see #8
These are the tasks that are not assigned to other issues (i.e. not simple proofing stuff)
- [ ] The quality of preparation of this manuscript should increase.see #8Other: