Closed Aariq closed 1 year ago
We originally counted all four types of amines to compare between the three subtypes and the overall count. At some point we talked about how it looked like the primary amines and just plain old amines are the same and we should get rid of the latter, but I guess we just still haven't actually done that?
Ok, good to know. I'll hold off on fixing this until after we get through currently open PRs. The next PR will hopefully include more tests for get_fx_groups()
that will catch this kind of thing.
@ledfordmarshall—FYI,numbers might be slightly off for amines.
There's a little conversation about this in the manuscript, linked to the "Amine" in the coefficients table.
On second thought, maybe we should deal with this and release a v1.0.2 before big breaking changes get merged. Any preference?
primary, secondary, and tertiary amines are already included in
calc_vol()
with coefficients and then this line also adds a coefficient for amines. Doesn't that double-count amines?https://github.com/Meredith-Lab/volcalc/blob/9e7250a9462224659766546efc1937236c07908b/R/calc_vol.R#L93C26-L93C26