Closed CorwinMacGregor closed 1 year ago
https://discord.com/channels/125011928711036928/216219467959500800/1123573804321472552 Here's Digi's comment in this regard
I implemented support for this in merge request #261. It uses a boolean rather than "unlimited". Check out the related tests to see examples, and the docs were also updated. Marking as closed.
Comment in closed issue #260 implies more natural support of setting rotor limits to "unlimited" by parsing argument to setting a rotor's limit properties to a string of "unlimited" as a value less than -2π (-360°) or greater than +2π (360°).
I would imagine that internally, a typecheck on the argument to setting a rotor's upper or lower limit could be typechecked, and if the result does not translate to a number, check if the translation is to a string of value "unlimited". if so, then if target property is lower limit, set property to equivalent of -361° if target property is upper limit, set property to equivalent of 361°