Closed kayabaNerve closed 3 years ago
It should be one with the smaller hash immediately after the fork block. This prevents mining two separate chains with the same work where the result can be decided in the future, instead of at the start of the fork.
Apparently, the protocol said to do this, so it wasn't a bug. Still a protocol issue and poor design.
It should be one with the smaller hash immediately after the fork block. This prevents mining two separate chains with the same work where the result can be decided in the future, instead of at the start of the fork.