Open Merrickneo opened 1 year ago
Logic contains the parser and other classes but the name of the logic component is actually just Logic.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: I get where the team is coming from. However, since figure 1.6 above says Class Diagram for "Logic" components, this class diagram's naming made me a little confused.
As such, changing it to "Class Diagram of "Logic Parser"" would be a more appropriate description to help with the comprehensibility of the reader. As such, I would think this would be a valid issue but does not really affect the documentation as a whole.
Hence, I would say this should be under NotInScope as it is valid in some areas but does not warrant a deduction for the dev team.
Figure label should be Class diagram for "Logic Parser"