Open rahulnccs opened 6 years ago
Even I am facing the same problem.
Can anyone share script used during analysis?
@microbod and @rahulnccs. Hi guys! which version are you running? The original bitbucket version or the version from this repo? When you downloaded and installed it would help us determine if these issues have been addressed yet.
@jmtsuji Could it be related to them using the old version of RefSeq?
https://bitbucket.org/doxeylab/metannotate/issues/7/possible-error-with-taxonomy-assignment
@rahulnccs Which version of RefSeq are you using?
I am using original package provided on link https://bitbucket.org/doxeylab/metannotate . One think I should mention for taxonomic assignment we were not using --run_mode=both, as FastTree, pplacer were showing error, assignment was USEARCH based ONLY.
@rahulnccs Using the installation on bitbucket, the installer pulls the latest version of RefSeq from NCBI. This RefSeq is not compatible with MetAnnotate since it no longer has GI numbers.
The last version of RefSeq with GI numbers can be found here:
https://zenodo.org/record/1098450#.WqLYAmYZPao
Swap out the DB and see if that fixes things.
We have some work arounds to make MetAnnotate work with the latest RefSeq, but they are not yet complete. We are waiting to do a new release before we incorporate them.
Thank you, we'll try and let you know.
Hello, We've performed Metannoatae on big metagenomic file(translated) against hmm of interest. Though we got the results, more than 99% remained to be assigned.
please help in this issue.