While selecting an area based on latitude and longitude (#400) is a good start, it does not cater for comparisons of more intricate regions, whether defined by orographic bounds or administrative ones.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be good to allow defining regions with some flexible format such as shapefiles or something.
What problem does your feature request solve?
While selecting an area based on latitude and longitude (#400) is a good start, it does not cater for comparisons of more intricate regions, whether defined by orographic bounds or administrative ones.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be good to allow defining regions with some flexible format such as shapefiles or something.
Describe alternatives you've considered