Open smnewman opened 1 year ago
@mikecooke77 I had forgotten about this issue. As of now, it doesn't seem too important to me. We could allow the old-style name to persist in yamls for VarObs Writer. What do you think?
We could do. I think at some point it would be nice to deal with but if its get forgotten in the sands of time then so be it. I think worth leaving the issue open.
@smnewman / @mikecooke77 , do you still want to keep this issue open? No problem if so, just checking.
The IODA naming conventions define the group
SurfEmiss
for surface emissivity: https://github.com/JCSDA-internal/ioda/blob/develop/share/ioda/yaml/validation/ObsSpace.yaml#L112. However, in opsinputsVarField_mwemiss
is mapped toEmiss/emissivity
. https://github.com/MetOffice/opsinputs/blob/develop/src/opsinputs/opsinputs_varobswriter_mod.F90#L861Accompanied by the change
Emiss/emissivity
->SurfEmiss/emissivity
for yamls in sith, source code in opsinputs should reflect the new naming convention.See https://github.com/MetOffice/sith/issues/163.