Closed andreleblanc11 closed 3 months ago
@andreleblanc11 After I reviewed it... I saw it was in draft mode... oops... Do you want to keep it in draft for a while, or did you intend to ask for it to be merged?
I want to add more bulletins in the mix for the test. So I'm working on another commit to add bulletins that are more frequently encountered on the NCPs.
But yes the idea was to have at least a pretty good test that is working, which is better then nothing.
I was able to get a working flow test for AM. All 9 tests pass at the moment.
The data flow watch -> (post locally) -> sarra -> (post locally) -> sender/am_send -> (AM socket) -> flow/amserver -> (post locally) -> download locally
Here are what the results look like when the test passes
Notes
SACN[34]
andKWAL
bulletins as they were causing problems downstream with the AM sender (or AM server, I forget which).^M
at the end of the file (before going through the socket). However, even when trying to remove these, the checksums were still different so I just decided to not compare the checksums before and after going through the AM socket.Points of improvement
static_flow
- COMPLETED