Standardize guild onboarding copy

alalonde commented 3 years ago

What would you like to be added?

We currently have this Notion page discussing Guild Onboarding. A lot of this content should probably be in our actual guild onboarding page in MyMeta. This will require some design work and copy work.

Why is this needed?

Because potential new guilds should have more context about joining: why, if they're a good fit, etc.

davort commented 3 years ago

@alalonde - I can take on the design part of this quest!

Just a few quick questions:

Are we thinking a "one-page" design, where all the information from Notion is laid out in a readable fashion? Or something else?
Any good examples to draw inspiration from?
Is this the page which will open when "For Guilds" is selected from https://wiki.metagame.wtf/?

Gnomeski commented 3 years ago

How would you lke copy adjstments/suggestions made? I would maybe break it down into:

Technical Alignment, Ethereum and Web3 already covered.
Social Alignment ie talking about hierarchies only existent for organisational reasons, not about power-over, authority etc, Importance of diversity, inclusiveness, accessibility, ID some of major issues we are looking to tackle here.
Political/philosophical Alignment: The reasoning behind our Social Alignment agenda, a desire to develop it further etc
Financial Alignment: 2 paths of Crypto type stuff. Community focused tkns, future tkn/trade bridging desire, co-operation via money markets as future aim ie growing to have all elements of ther metafactory operating in some way in a decentralised 'marketplace' or simply favour4favour agreements as collaborators for the commons/human centred organisations (DAOs).

Seeking more clarity over what exactly we are offering after all the doing Good and Podcast etc is completed.. We are acting in an advisory/support capacity then. Providing advice and.or links/connections/networking.. ? We then are 'open to trade' in terms of being 'operators for hire' to actually work on their DAOs etc? How this works ie Sourcecred etc? Meanwhile who is building MetaGame etc? Are we offering as hack squad for a fee for example a bit like RG?

Anther question is, altho not on the agenda or required for this copy piece (which already seems pretty good , without any of my comments tbh) can we eventually extend our Sourcecred set up and the use of SEED to other communities which do not have a tkn? In order to get these privelidges and trust how long would they have to be a member and criteria for that.. oh shit am going on again! 🙄

junkmail-taken commented 3 years ago

I'd like to echo this - I think if we evaluate workflows and designated roles below would be useful as roles can change / evolve.

Also, structuring PR "tools" used as a stand alone for revision and case evaluation relative to a version.

Template for PR can be created developed once a definition of workflow is structured.

alalonde commented 3 years ago

1. Are we thinking a "one-page" design, where all the information from Notion is laid out in a readable fashion? Or something else?

Yes, I think it should probably a more concise version of the wiki page.

2. Any good examples to draw inspiration from?

... no 😁

3. Is this the page which will open when "For Guilds" is selected from https://wiki.metagame.wtf/?

No, I think there will just be a CTA in that existing wiki page directing them to this new (well, improved) MyMeta page

alalonde commented 3 years ago

How would you lke copy adjstments/suggestions made? I would maybe break it down into:
* **Technical Alignment,** Ethereum and Web3 already covered.

* **Social Alignment** ie talking about hierarchies only existent for organisational reasons, not about power-over, authority etc, Importance of diversity, inclusiveness, accessibility, ID some of major issues we are looking to tackle here.

* **Political/philosophical Alignment**: The reasoning behind our Social Alignment agenda, a desire to develop it further etc

* **Financial Alignment**: 2 paths of Crypto type stuff. Community focused tkns, future tkn/trade bridging desire, co-operation via money markets as  future aim ie growing to have all elements of ther metafactory operating in some way in a decentralised 'marketplace' or simply favour4favour agreements as collaborators for the commons/human centred organisations (DAOs).
Seeking more clarity over what exactly we are offering after all the doing Good and Podcast etc is completed.. We are acting in an advisory/support capacity then. Providing advice and.or links/connections/networking.. ? We then are 'open to trade' in terms of being 'operators for hire' to actually work on their DAOs etc? How this works ie Sourcecred etc? Meanwhile who is building MetaGame etc? Are we offering as hack squad for a fee for example a bit like RG?

Anther question is, altho not on the agenda or required for this copy piece (which already seems pretty good , without any of my comments tbh) can we eventually extend our Sourcecred set up and the use of SEED to other communities which do not have a tkn? In order to get these privelidges and trust how long would they have to be a member and criteria for that.. oh shit am going on again! 🙄

These are all good questions, and probably worth discussion with the greater community. To keep this moving, I'd say just take what is already in that wiki page and condense it a bit