Open Gudahtt opened 3 years ago
I forgot to update the readme!
Edit: README has been updated; this should be good to go now.
@Gudahtt could this be revisted? I think removing ethjs across all the dependencies we maintain would be a solid move considering its staleness.
Happy to take this on, but i'd like more clarification on the issue you highlighted.
I think what we want here is a type that represents an EIP-1193 provider. Then we can pass a provider that implements that interface (e.g. an Ethers provider) without being tied to a specific version of that specific library
ethers
is better maintained thanethjs
, and we've been migrating many of our packages to use it. This should work equivalently.This will be a breaking change because this will change public properties of the method registry class.