Open marsrobertson opened 1 year ago
Cross chain addresses do not always match. (See wintermute OP token exploit)
Cross chain addresses do not always match.
Exception rather than a rule.
99% they match.
Balance of usability and security is towards unified address book.
Are there any genuine use cases where the same 0x123...ABC
address belongs to different people?
In case of $OP and Wintermute:
It doesn’t necessarily work across chains. “Having control over mainnet Safe doesn’t guarantee control on other EVM compatible chains (unlike ordinary wallets),” Wintermute explained in a message to the Optimism community on the Layer 2’s forum.
Source: https://thedefiant.io/optimism-20m-exploit
I still believe it is an exception, not a rule. Since then, has any action been taken on the Gnosis Safe side to avoid similar exploits in the future?
Describe the enhancement
I'm aware I'm doxxing myself but my ENS names are on chain anyway, I'm not running darknet marketplace, I err on the side of adoption, simplicity, usability. Please don't hack me.
Steps to reproduce
Cross chain address book would be nice
Error messages or log output
No response
Version
10.22.1
Build type
No response
Browser
Chrome
Operating system
MacOS
Hardware wallet
No response
Additional context
I've tried to search for "address book" in open issues and didn't find, that's why opening a new issue.