Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by henrichs...@gmail.com
on 18 Jan 2012 at 7:06
Summary of the post:
`Gofer project load:....` is getting close to something that would make better
sense, but `Metacello load:....` might be a better alternative even though it
might just be a cover for `Gofer project....`.
Ben lists a number of the Gofer project features that he likes[1]... Which
makes think that the command line interface would gain from wrapping some of
the MetacelloToolbox api, too.
Another advantage of `Metacello load:...` is that it would provide an
opportunity for Metacello to have a presence in a base image ... which means
that the ensureMetacello would be built-into all images ... which means a
common superclass for configurations could be included .... worth thinking
about a little bit
[1]
http://forum.world.st/Newbie-observations-on-use-of-Metacello-tp4212946p4218364.
html
Original comment by henrichs...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2012 at 10:12
Original comment by henrichs...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2012 at 9:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
henrichs...@gmail.com
on 19 Dec 2011 at 5:22