Closed pdebruic closed 9 years ago
It looks like the code for 1.0.0-beta.32.17 is no longer passing - these results do not include your changes ... I suspect tests have changed since then .. so I am seriously considering merging this without passing travis tests ... remind me why I thought that we needed to make these changes:)
After merging this change we will get a new SHA we can reference in the ConfigurationOfMetacelloPreview (which we will update then all over the place) to ensure that when someone using Squeak 4.6 or 5.0 runs an #ensureMetacello process they get a version of Metacello that knows about the platform attributes for Squeak 4.6 & 5.0.
I think its fine to merge because it only affects the platform attributes on Squeak, and the code worksforme.....
Now I will start work on updating the Configuration ... open an issue for tracking
We started the configuration on Friday I think. I've got it on my laptop. I'll push it and make a PR.
Whoops, I made the same edits earlier this afternoon: bda06bff03992bab0d1af428c2e26bc038e77f25 ... seeing lots of test failures on both yours and mine - I assume that the problem is that we're hitting github api rate limits running the tests ... I've been restarting my tests and I think they are passing ... so I'm going to nuke your test run and go with my edits since the tests are further along ...
Sounds good.
On Aug 24, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Dale Henrichs notifications@github.com wrote:
Whoops, I made the same edits earlier this afternoon: bda06bf ... seeing lots of test failures on both yours and mine - I assume that the problem is that we're hitting github api rate limits running the tests ... I've been restarting my tests and I think they are passing ... so I'm going to nuke your test run and go with my edits since the tests are further along ...
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
patiently waiting :)
@krono see the comment on issue #365 ...
Sorry @krono, I've got a lot of things on my plate right now and if the tests all ran green it would be much easier for me to just press a merge button ... I have yet to see 4.6 and/or 5.0 pass on travis either ...
On 8/28/15 7:02 AM, Tobias Pape wrote:
/patiently waiting/ :)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/pull/366#issuecomment-135782217.
No problem :) I am still on vacation and hence quite unresponsive
issue #365