Closed jfigui closed 1 year ago
I will take a look, @jfigui could you provide an example where this happens please?
Sure, I will send you some test files by email
Hi @jfigui , issue happens when both radar objects have an azimuth value very close to zero but due to floating number precision they differ,
for example if f1.azimuth['data'][0] = 7.702979e-16 and f2.azimuth['data'][0] = 8.548066e-15
then
field_interp = pyrad.io.read_data_radar.interpol_field(f1, f2, 'reflectivity')
¨
will give a blank northernmost azimuth (because f2.azimuth['data'][0] > f1.azimuth['data'][0], so f1.azimuth['data'][0] (angle_new in interpol_field) is outside of interpolation range). A simple fix I would see would be to use
angle_new = np.around(angle_new, 3)
angle_old = np.around(angle_old , 3)
to round them to a reasonable precision that would correspond to the true measurement of the rotary encoder (and not some random floating numbers fluctuations). We could also use a much higher value such as 10 instead of 3, I don't know what would make sense.
Would that be ok?
Cheers,
The function has difficulties in the transition between 360 and 0 degree so quite often the northernmost pointing ray is left blank.