Open rdemaria opened 1 year ago
Dear Riccardo
This is as described in http://madx.web.cern.ch/madx/madX/doc/usrguide/Introduction/solenoid.html
Thick specify KS Thin specify both KS and KSI
Cheers, Helmut
On 19 Oct, 2022, at 12:04, Riccardo De Maria @.***> wrote:
SOLO: SOLENOID, L = 2., KSI = 0.001;
Madx is not preventing invalid input. Perhaps we should add that the ksi is not used for l>0 and issue a warning. Similarly it is not clear whether ks is needed for l=0. What about using Lrad like in orbit correctors instead of ksi?
Specifying thin solenoids with KSI and LRAD rather than KS and KSI would in fact be more similar to what’s used for example for correctors. If we agree on that I will be happy to update MAKETHIN to do this.
For backward compatibility KS, KSI should still be allowed
On 19 Oct, 2022, at 12:47, Riccardo De Maria @.***> wrote:
Madx is not preventing invalid input. Perhaps we should add that the ksi is not used for l>0 and issue a warning. Similarly it is not clear whether ks is needed for l=0. What about using Lrad like in orbit correctors instead of ksi?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MethodicalAcceleratorDesign/MAD-X/issues/1147#issuecomment-1283804636, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEUCRLVW3LUYCH7T5N5SAITWD7GSXANCNFSM6AAAAAARI6JZDU. You are receiving this because you commented.
I agree with your proposal!
SOLO: SOLENOID, L = 2., KSI = 0.001;
succeds but KSI is ignored