Closed elisemarika closed 1 year ago
Ideas
Expanding on above:
In Context
Marketplace Managers may or may not know which networks they want to enable as Sponsors, Analysts, Reviewers.
If they know, then they should be able to search for a specific network.
If they don't know, then they should be able to explore options and be served relevant networks.
Discovery
While the Badge discovery views get us started, proper discovery of networks within the Metrics context will include aggregate stats about the actors in that network. ie:
Network | Members | Commitments | Great Outcomes | Satisfaction Rate | Total Winnings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expert IBC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50% | $2,500 |
Crypto Curious | 5,000 | 1,933 | 1,894 | 98% | $12,000 |
Expert EVM | 14 | 12 | 11 | 92% | $12,000 |
Pine Analytics | 29 | 14 | 14 | 100% | $15,000 |
Network Onboarding
After talking with @nftchance about this a bit earlier today, I'm rolling back my thoughts on deploying onchain modules for these networks and making them managers.
Rather than having a permissioned manager that can burn account bound tokens, we can limit the "locking"/"slashing" action to transferable Badges only.
This opens a design space with n-badge wherein a user may be required to have a non-transferrable token representing some access and a transferable token that is locked as a commitment.
I still see operational friction around onboarding that we can ease. Existing networks may need to add a new transferable token to their contract or create a new contract if they want users to lock something that they control the supply of.
Membership
Wonder what may show up here?
We can show the general architecture of a contracts network visually, and I would love to do that. But I think it may make more sense to put that in Badger rather than for it to be Metrics specific. In the context of Metrics, knowing what the network has accomplished, what its outstanding commitments are, and what commitments it can take on seem most valuable to me.
Additionally, it may be nice to enable communication between members, but this also feels generalizable to Badger rather than needing to be Metrics specific. In the case of Metrics, relevant Badger networks can be given Guild based roles in Discord if/as desired.
After initial Discovery, we have decided to pause efforts on integrations into the app.
Network Discoverability will be solved for MetricsDAO via Gitbook.
Network Stats will be solved with queries.
Network Discoverability will exist on Badger, in the context of Badger.
@elisemarika given that we're not taking action in Metrics app on this now, should this be closed?
One item that would improve UX for the operators would be the ability to select from a dropdown when defining the Marketplace (rather than copy / pasting an address) but, we'd want to retain the ability to paste it and this could be addressed later in a separate ticket
@drakedanner feel free to close and we can open separate tickets in the future yes
Need a Jam session on this one!