Closed jgbarah closed 12 years ago
It does. In-Reply-To
is stored in the column is_response_of
of the table messages
. Why do we use that name for the column? I guess it is an Israel-ism :-)
I have built relations with threads in order to get the social network in mailing lists, so I know it works.
According to git blame pymlstats/analyzer.py
it exists since 2007-03-15 17:51:13 +0000.
The name was my choice indeed :). The name is "is_response_of" in the "messages" table. It should be the second column in the messages table. See:
https://github.com/MetricsGrimoire/MailingListStats/blob/master/pymlstats/analyzer.py#L84 https://github.com/MetricsGrimoire/MailingListStats/blob/master/pymlstats/database.py#L355
If it is not being stored, that's a bug.
ok, now I understand why I didn't found it ;-)
Thanks!
Jesus.
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 00:49 -0700, Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote:
It does. In-Reply-To is stored in the column in_response_of of the table messages. Why do we use that column name? I guess is an Israel-ism :-)
I have built relation with threads in order to get the social network in mailing lists.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 00:56 -0700, Israel Herraiz wrote:
The name was my choice indeed :). The name is "is_response_of" in the "messages" table. It should be the second column in the messages table. See:
https://github.com/MetricsGrimoire/MailingListStats/blob/master/pymlstats/analyzer.py#L84 https://github.com/MetricsGrimoire/MailingListStats/blob/master/pymlstats/database.py#L355
If it is not being stored, that's a bug.
No, it seems to be stored correctly. I just was looking for a field "in_reply_to" ;-)
Saludos,
Jesus.
My mistake! Thanks Jesus, Germàn, Israel.
I am closing this issue. If you find that the value is not stored, please feel free to reopen it.
It seems MLStats is not storing the In-Reply-To field in the database. Any reason for that? I guess we could easily parse it, if present, which would allow for several kinds of studies, such as those related to threading.
[Thanks to Dave Neary for the idea]