search

MiKTeX / docker-miktex

the Docker image for running MiKTeX
41 stars 28 forks source link

Outdated Dockerfile #37

Closed keesj closed 1 year ago

keesj commented 1 year ago

Hi,

The docker file in this repository looks quite outdated. I made a few changes (but still do not have the full system running). 1) Switched to Jammy (Latest LTS of ubuntu)

1) Modified RUN apt-key adv --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys D6BC243565B2087BC3F897C9277A7293F59E4889 RUN echo "deb http://miktex.org/download/ubuntu jammy universe" | tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/miktex.list

to

RUN curl -fsSL "https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD6BC243565B2087BC3F897C9277A7293F59E4889" | gpg --dearmor -o /usr/share/keyrings/miktex.gpg \ && echo "deb [arch=amd64, signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/miktex.gpg] http://miktex.org/download/ubuntu jammy universe" | tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/miktex.list

This method requires curl to be installed but at least does not use the soon deprecated apt-key tool.

3) Modified the mpm calls by calls using miktex packages function

4) Modified the containter to add a user and run the setup as user. This appears to be the currently preffered way?

keesj commented 1 year ago

I still have #36 with this setup

keesj commented 1 year ago

Additionally is appears the #4 discusses NOT using a USER. .. so does the install need to be make "shared" or installed under the root user? running as root does gives a lot of warnings

jdoubleu commented 1 year ago

Maybe you could submit your changes in a PR?

keesj commented 1 year ago

hi @jdoubleu: I was not able to either use this image nor create my own e.g. I do not have the full system running

stale[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

PHPirates commented 1 year ago

hi @jdoubleu: I was not able to either use this image nor create my own e.g. I do not have the full system running

Weird, I uploaded my updated image to github and it's working fine.

irishismyname commented 11 months ago

I was having all kinds of weird problems with the image on Docker hub (digest ebd838f3) and almost gave up. However, after I built the image from b29fc32 (current HEAD as of writing) and it worked as expected. It seems like this repo could use a GitHub action to build & push the image 🤔.