Closed KawaiiDinosaur closed 3 years ago
Test name | Test Count | Mister GBA | mGBA |
---|---|---|---|
Memory | 1552 | 1552 | 1552 |
IOREAD | 123 | 123 | 110 |
Timing | 1660 | 1606 | 1560 |
Timer | 936 | 442 | 744 |
Timer IRQ | 90 | 65 | 70 |
Shifter | 140 | 140 | 140 |
Carry | 93 | 93 | 93 |
BIOSMath | 615 | 615 | 615 |
DMATests | 1256 | 1248 | 1232 |
EdgeCase | 10 | 5 | 8 |
Multiply | 72 | 52 | 52 |
Layer Toggle | 1 | pass | fail |
OAM Update | 1 | fail | fail |
Yeah, he's aware of where his core sits in terms of accuracy tests. I don't know what his plans are for the future in terms of accuracy is concerned, but would be cool if further improvements could be made, but currently games seem to run extremely well.
Yes the table wasn't updated long time and in the meantime a lot has changed on both the GBA core and mGBA and it's testbench. Also some newer emulators would probably need to be included now.
I removed the comparison for the time being. It was not accurate anymore and it doesn't cover newer, more accurate emulators like Nanoboy or Eggvance.