Closed itchyny closed 2 years ago
It seems that iterators in term suffices is evaluated in different order than jq.
❯ jq -n '[range(4)][0,1:][0,2]' 0 1 2 3 ❯ xq -n '[range(4)][0,1:][0,2]' 0 2 1 3 ❯ xq --version xq 0.1.9-dcd6c4a024b54b3b2d0dc7ed90a349d42c11aa67
There are various queries (e.x. jq '.b[]."\(.a[])"' <<< '{ "a": [0,1], "b": [{"0":1,"1":2},{"0":3,"1":4}] }') to hit this difference but the above query is the simplest one.
jq '.b[]."\(.a[])"' <<< '{ "a": [0,1], "b": [{"0":1,"1":2},{"0":3,"1":4}] }'
Thank you for the report! Fixed in #59 but I guess there are probably other things that has a similar evaluation ordering issue.
It seems that iterators in term suffices is evaluated in different order than jq.
There are various queries (e.x.
jq '.b[]."\(.a[])"' <<< '{ "a": [0,1], "b": [{"0":1,"1":2},{"0":3,"1":4}] }'
) to hit this difference but the above query is the simplest one.