Closed erikarvstedt closed 1 year ago
There should be a way to opt out from running the tests then, as they might involve virtualisation, which might not be available for everyone.
Any generated output, and perhaps the PR template should be adjusted then to also tell whether tests or not have been (successfully) ran.
Duplicate of https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/issues/77
Package update PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/206835 broke the corresponding module (later fixed here).
This could have been prevented if the standard review command (
nixpkgs-review pr 206835
) would automatically run the package-specific NixOS tests defined inpassthru.tests
.Instead, reviewers need to manually run the test with an extra command:
This is error-prone, not least because the NixOS test name can differ from the package name (like in this case).
cc @NobbZ, @SuperSandro2000