The naming scheme for each table's record class isn't easy to understand, they should be clearer on what they are meant for.
For example, the ItemsTable class has ItemsRecord & ItemsReturnRecord. The former is meant to be how the data is represented in the table and the latter is intended to be how the data should be returned to a client but the current wording is confusing.
The naming scheme for each table's record class isn't easy to understand, they should be clearer on what they are meant for.
For example, the
ItemsTableclass hasItemsRecord&ItemsReturnRecord. The former is meant to be how the data is represented in the table and the latter is intended to be how the data should be returned to a client but the current wording is confusing.