MichDe / seostats

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/seostats
0 stars 0 forks source link

Page rank retrieve not accurate data between domain and page urls. #17

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Which method(/function) produce a problem?
1.Google_Page_Rank() from version 2.0.6

Does the method(/function) produce the problem for all given URL's?
(If not, what specific URL produces the problem?)
1.) http://forums.digitalpoint.com/
2.) http://forums.digitalpoint.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43

Please provide any additional information below:

If you execute Page rank function given the 2 urls above they will have the 
same result(4) BUT when you execute those urls and use the Google's toolbar 
result, they will have different values 4 and 3 respectively.

Why Google_Page_Rank() don't accurately gets values given a specific path/page 
from the website. It's just working like whatever the value of the domain will 
be the value for all the pages of the site. Page ranks should not work that 
way. Right? 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by gojen...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2011 at 8:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Anyone can answer my issue above? it's been like that so far all the sites and 
pages I have tested

Original comment by gojen...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2011 at 8:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
First of, hold on and take a breath..

A) Yes, you're right. The Page Rank method returns the PR for the initialized 
host domain only.

B) This is not a 'defect', as you flagged it - the method performs exactly the 
action (and returning the results) it's being 'told'.

C) If you're not able to understand the code and to see that you actualy just 
need to change one single line to get the PR method return the result you want, 
you're always to ask your questions. But C.1) i think the request section, 
mentioned at the front page, is a better place then the issue tracker 
(especially when it's not an issue at all) and C.2) bumping your 'request' only 
a few minutes after you filed it, is not the kind of tone i like.

Cheers!

--INVALID  CLOSED--

Original comment by eyecatchup@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2011 at 8:53