Open maelle opened 1 year ago
They're definitely closely related... One reason to keep them separate is we might prefer the translator to do po_update()
themselves because of the fuzzy/deprecated messages. The package author may have no context on whether a fuzzy
message still makes sense after the update.
@hadley I notice now po_update()
is not mentioned in either of the new vignettes. Do you have notes handy on the design here / should we add an explanation to the vignette(s)?
Hmmmm, good question. Maybe po_extract()
could automatically run po_update()
if there are existing translations?
I might be missing something obvious but why is
po_update()
separate frompo_extract()
when we always have to run it afterpo_extract()
?