Closed Masoumehrahimi closed 1 year ago
Add --verbose
to your command and check the output how many poses can be matched in each case.
Probably that number is lower in the right plot.
Would you please explain more? I did not get your point! I have compared two trajectories with the same ground truth, why the ground truth is different?
The ground truth is not different, probably just different poses are used for the comparison because of matching.
Poses in ground truth are matched to the poses in your trajectory by matching the timestamps. If less timestamps can be matched or there are less poses in general, the number of poses will vary. You can see this in the output when you add --verbose
.
The ground truth is not different, probably just different poses are used for the comparison because of matching. Poses in ground truth are matched to the poses in your trajectory by matching the timestamps. If less timestamps can be matched or there are less poses in general, the number of poses will vary. You can see this in the output when you add
--verbose
.
Interesting, Thanks a lot
You can also force it to plot always the full reference with --plot_full_ref
. This of course only changes the plot and doesn't change the matching before the metric calculation. Options like --t_max_diff
would affect that, see --help
or the wiki.
Hi I have considered GPS as my ground truth, but I do not know why on the plots related error mapped onto trajectories, the references are not the same.
I want to know why the dashed line (reference) are different in these two plots, while both of them have GPS as their reference.
thanks