copy and paste function for parts of argumentations (issue #151).
Creation of new categories, at least possible for me, see issue #278
add ... a distinction of cases (see issue #303 )
get rid of the 10s refreshment for editing the map name. If you click to change the name, the clock needs to stop. Do we need the 10s refreshment at all? Issue #299
when adding an argument, the reason box is created, but the yellow support box with "Or do you want to start with an an argument scheme" went missing. Please reinstate. Not urgent.
start with a template, not only an argument scheme (issue #279)
Hard-coded language that need to refer to the translation.xml. issue #258
automatic rearrangement of text boxes when something is added later, issue #293
Discussion: Currently, if user deletes an element on a map, this element is simply hidden, it remains in the database. Nothing is really deleted. The reason for this design was that we need it if we offer the option to show the history of a map (see issue #276). However, this leads to several problems. First, the search lists also hidden elements (see issue #277). Second, since parts of very large maps cannot be moved, users might try to delete elements to make moving possible. However, this does not help based on the fact that nothing actually gets deleted. So, should we actually delete stuff?
Future work
Allow change of the order of reasons by moving them above each other with automatic adjustment of overall layout: issue #251
searchable help system, issue #281.
move chain of arguments on very large maps. See issue #162.
Search function. Validation of search-statement (issue #274 ).
Vandalism. We need a discussion on how to react to trolls. See issue #213.
uploading of resources
Defending a negated statement by a modus ponens argument (another form of unification, see issue #110, 2nd comment)
Change language from within the system
voting on the quality of maps, author information in map lists. See issue #247
Where is the music playing, where are the most arguments and debates? See issue #198
If somebody else adds something to my map, the system shots me an e-mail. See issue #185
call up the history of the mapping process. Even though there will be no "undo" function based on the collaborative character of the software, it would be great if it would be possible to call up the history of the mapping process. This way things that have been discarded could be found and used again. See issue #51
code "constructive dilemma" (issue #232 ).
code "either way" (issue #231).
automatic organization of boxes on a map would be great. You add an objection or another argument to something, and the system moves things automatically so that you do not always get overlaps. Issue #293
voting system about the acceptability of counterexamples and counterarguments
adaptation to tablet-technology (touch screen functionality)
Reward system, awards. Love and glory motivate people to invest time in online collaboration and the creation of collective intelligence (Malone et al. 2010). A nice example for an award system has been implemented in http://openstudy.com, a GT project: "Earn credentials and rewards: Get recognition. A volunteering certificate. A report of problem solving, engagement and teamwork. Subject specific titles. Advance in school, college or employment."; "Meet some awesome people and make friends: Why study alone? The OpenStudy community is full of friendly people just like you. We make learning fun."; "Become a respected helper: Help someone understand a concept or solve a problem. Become their LifeSaver! Manage the community as a Moderator. Earn money as a Qualified Helper." https://ashwinram.org. Latest blogpost 2010! http://blog.openstudy.com. Very extensive list of possibilities in the Octalysis octogon at http://yukaichou.com.
For 3.10 (ranked according to importance)
Future work