Closed napulen closed 2 years ago
Corrected the typos and changed the line to: Most critically, EDO.js is, to the best of our knowledge, the most comprehensive library to supports non-standard tuning to date.
Should this issue be closed?
On the last correction, a small typo supports
-> support
.
Just bringing it up, I don't need to see the correction.
Closing the issue now.
This issue is related to the following review: openjournals/joss-reviews#3784
https://github.com/MichaelSel/edoJS/blob/feb06495b1ce4ed3a957ce2d4c1e08bb8fd67893/paper.md?plain=1#L32
Any references/experiments to support the claim? Otherwise, it feels a bit hyperbolic. I'd tone it down a cent:
"EDO.js is, to the best of our knowledge, the most comprehensive library supporting non-standard tuning."