Closed staceycy closed 3 years ago
Hi,
Thank you for your interest.
It might be due to different system specifications. Could you let me know the information of your OS, GPU, and PyTorch version?
I do not think that you need to modify any other parameters than the random seed (args.seed in main.py
).
I recommend to test with other seed numbers and repeat the training multiple times.
Thank you.
Hi @kylemin,
Thank you very much for your reply. After changing the Pytorch version, I can achieve similar results as yours. By the way, is it possible for you to share the feature and annotation for the ActivityNet dataset?
Thank you.
Stacey
Hi again, I am glad that you could achieve similar results. Sure, this is the link to the ActivityNet features we used. ActivityNet-features I also uploaded the annotation.json file in the google drive. Thank you. Kyle
Hi Kyle,
Many thanks for your prompt reply. I will try with the ActivityNet features and get back to you when the training is done.
Thank you again for your kind help.
Best, Stacey
Hi,
Thank you very much for your interesting work.
I have run your code with the default parameters, but fail to get the reported results in the paper. Following are the results on validation set: 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 My results 0: 26.37 || 98.25 | 56.94, 51.97, 42.12, 33.52, 25.24, 15.52, 7.76, 3.62, 0.66 Reported results 0: 29.99 || 98.39 | 61.17, 56.08, 48.05, 38.98, 30.13, 19.15, 10.55, 4.81, 0.95
Could you please tell me whether I need to modify any other parameters in your codes?
Thank you very much.
Best, Stacey