I have difficulties reproducing the result reported on the EGTEA Gaze+ dataset. I'm using your provided trained weights and following the guide on code usage I get this number on different splits:
I think that the problem is the optical flow.
For the optical flow frames, I used this repository: link.
If you build it, libpydenseflow.so will be created. Then, you can use this file to extract the flow frames.
Hi and thanks for the great work.
I have difficulties reproducing the result reported on the EGTEA Gaze+ dataset. I'm using your provided trained weights and following the guide on code usage I get this number on different splits:
test_split1.txt
:acc: 36.85, 49.21 / 0:22:27
test_split2.txt
:acc: 47.65, 57.44 / 0:15:22
test_split3.txt
:acc: 50.41, 60.14 / 0:15:07
How should I reproduce 69.73%?
I'm using parameters as default: