No performance aspect when comparing logic apps and durable functions

[ciufudean]

This architecture document surfaces a latency aspect when comparing logic apps and functions Logic Apps works best in scenarios that don't require low latency for a response, such as asynchronous or semi long-running API calls. If low latency is required, for example in a call that blocks a user interface, use a different technology. For example, use Azure Functions [...]

Should't this aspect be included in the table in section Compare Azure Functions and Azure Logic Apps?

---

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: 82ee9751-961d-7109-63d6-813b1862c632
• Version Independent ID: 583d1b2f-9c1a-3580-9d14-37bb551eaf44
• Content: Integration and automation platform options in Azure
• Content Source: articles/azure-functions/functions-compare-logic-apps-ms-flow-webjobs.md
• Service: azure-functions
• GitHub Login: @ggailey777
• Microsoft Alias: glenga

[Naveenommi-MSFT]

@ciufudean Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate.