MicrosoftDocs / azure-docs

Open source documentation of Microsoft Azure
https://docs.microsoft.com/azure
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
10.2k stars 21.34k forks source link

add IoT central to this page #69915

Open panabaker opened 3 years ago

panabaker commented 3 years ago

This page currently says IoT Hub is a prereq but I just got here from reading an IoT Central quick start page. Is it an alternative to IoT hub?


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

panabaker commented 3 years ago

oops, meant to leave page not close issue.

SatishBoddu-MSFT commented 3 years ago

Hello @panabaker Thanks for reaching out to us, We wanted to know the first tutorial which you have started with, IoT Central ?, could you please let us know which doc/tutorial you have started so that we better understand this issue.

panabaker commented 3 years ago

rangv/AzureIoTCentralEFlow (github.com)https://github.com/rangv/AzureIoTCentralEFlow

SatishBoddu-MSFT commented 3 years ago

@panabaker I think you have read the last section and navigated to here, right?

Install and provision Azure IoT Edge for Linux on a Windows device

SatishBoddu-MSFT commented 3 years ago

Hello @panabaker Thanks for the feedback!.

We have added the below note to the target repo which clears the confusion. I hope this helps to resolve your query!

image

Please let us know if you need further help in this matter.

panabaker commented 3 years ago

this isn't super clear. Rather, I would say "An alternative to creating an IoT Hub is to connect your device to the Azure IoT Central service. See this document for more information: Azure IoT Edge for Linux on Windows (EFLOW) with IoT Central"

Note, I would append "with IoT Central" to your link as it is the actual title of the linked page.

SatishBoddu-MSFT commented 3 years ago

@panabaker I think we should submit the issue under the target document's repo, where we started actually. @rangv Do you have thoughts on this? Do you suggest we move this issue under the actual repo?

image