Closed miqm closed 3 years ago
@miqm , thank you for your feedback. We'll review this and get back to you shortly!
LB with IP based backends is recent addition to LB feature set. PLS is not supported in that configuration. It is indeed a limitation. I will update the limitations section to include this. Thanks
@sumeetmittal thank you. xo you have plans to support it?
Yes, this is a roadmap item.
that's great news. can you provide some eta, eg. q3 2021?
@miqm , we have assigned issue to the respective product owner for updating the doc accordingly.
@sumeetmittal , I have assigned the issue to you for the doc update.
Limitation section for the Private Link Service page is updated. Re: ETA - This is a roadmap item for H2CY21 but subjected to planning decisions..
Document updated.
@sumeetmittal we're closing to the end of H2CY2021, any update on the feature?
@sumeetmittal I'm particularly keen for this feature also; any word on this?
@adetterer @miqm - This feature didn't make into this semester due to other high priority work. This will be taken up as a planning item for next semester in Feb 2022. Thanks
@sumeetmittal, any updates on this ticket? This looks like it would fix a problem we have in our current infrastructure.
Its called in the limitations section. We are looking into this work for availability by end of this year. Thanks
Well it's 2 years later, @sumeetmittal any word on if this has been worked on?
IP based backends in LB, still not working with PLS.
Error message
Private Link Service does not support a load balancer that has IP based backend pool, which is used in Consumption + Dedicated environments.
Hey Folks, looping in @ShaneBala-keyvault, the feature is entering private preview phase and he can help to onboard those interested in testing out :)
@ivapplyr yes I’d love to test that out!
@ivapplyr ,count me in.
@ivapplyr would love to join as well!
@. @.>/ @Ajoy @.> / @Mario @.>
Seems we have more preview candidates 😝
From: Austin DeLaRosa @.> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 2:59 PM To: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs @.> Cc: Ivens Applyrs @.>, Mention @.> Subject: Re: [MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs] Private Link service limitation - IP based load balancer (#75134)
@ivapplyrhttps://github.com/ivapplyr may I be added to the private preview of PLS with an IP based backend pool? I absolutely need this feature!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/75134#issuecomment-2251202342, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APMGRQPYGKWXURN7C56E2V3ZOFDHHAVCNFSM44WYVTU2U5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TEMRVGEZDAMRTGQZA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@ivapplyr how can i get added to the private preview?
@delarooster that link has a form for a private preview of private endpoints for container apps.
This thread is concerning the ability to use IP based backends for an ILB with private link enabled.
Is there a private preview available for the latter? @ivapplyr @ShaneBala-keyvault
When trying to create a backend pool based on the IP, not the NIC, I’m getting error that LB with private link does not support IP-based backends.
This is a major limitation of private link but the documentation says nothing about it.
This functionality can be handy if we’d like to expose through private link some service that we have in e.g. on-premise network and we can only connect to an IP through Vnet peering & VPN.
details":[ { "code": "PrivateLinkServiceIsNotSupportedForIPBasedLoadBalancer", "message": "Private link service is not supported for load balancer /subscriptions/GUID/resourceGroups/rg/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/lb with backend addresses set by (virtualNetwork, ipAddress) or (subnet, ipAddress)." }
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.