MicrosoftDocs / msteams-docs

Source for the Microsoft Teams developer platform documentation.
https://aka.ms/teamsdev
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
281 stars 502 forks source link

Additional Clarity Needed on Compliance Boundaries #10466

Closed jpalarchio closed 6 months ago

jpalarchio commented 6 months ago

Type of issue

Missing information

Feedback

This statement in the article could use more clarity: "By adding your chatbot to Microsoft Teams, some of the data, such as bot content and user chat content, is shared with Teams. It means that your data flows outside of your organization’s compliance and geographic or regional boundaries."

Are we talking about data at rest, data in transit? Can you provide some examples of when this would occur? Is this mitigated by publishing the PVA in a region that matches the M365 tenant region?

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/platform/bots/how-to/add-power-virtual-agents-bot-to-teams

Content source URL

https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/msteams-docs/blob/main/msteams-platform/bots/how-to/add-power-virtual-agents-bot-to-teams.md

Author

@surbhigupta

Document Id

dddc2210-7f53-fbfb-7905-a52d9acd0e23

microsoft-github-policy-service[bot] commented 6 months ago

Hi jpalarchio! Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. We will investigate and if we require further information we will reach out in one business day. Please use this link to escalate if you don't get replies.

Best regards, Teams Platform

Vikram-MSFT commented 6 months ago

Hello @jpalarchio - Thanks for raising your query.

Hello @jpalarchio - Could you please refer this detailed documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot-studio/data-location?tabs=web#customer-data

microsoft-github-policy-service[bot] commented 6 months ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 3 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 3 days of this comment.