The instructions request the dataflow be renamed after creation:
There is no new name recommended. Thereafter the instructions still reference dataflow as "Dataflow 1":
I think there are at least 2 possible solutions to make this aspect consistent:
1) Remove the rename step as it's not needed
2) Keep the rename step, provide a suggested new name, and update downstream instructions to reference the new name
IMO Option 2 is ideal in terms of best-practices of using meaningful (rather than auto-generated) names for Fabric items, however, it's a bit more effort to integrate into the instructions :)
The instructions request the dataflow be renamed after creation:
There is no new name recommended. Thereafter the instructions still reference dataflow as "Dataflow 1":
I think there are at least 2 possible solutions to make this aspect consistent:
1) Remove the rename step as it's not needed 2) Keep the rename step, provide a suggested new name, and update downstream instructions to reference the new name
IMO Option 2 is ideal in terms of best-practices of using meaningful (rather than auto-generated) names for Fabric items, however, it's a bit more effort to integrate into the instructions :)