Closed yardstick17 closed 2 years ago
Hi @yardstick17,
please look at the docs at https://github.com/MicrosoftPremier/VstsExtensions/blob/master/BuildQualityChecks/en-US/PullRequests.md#pull-request-policy. I believe they describe the scenario you would like to achieve.
The task needs a baseline build for the comparison and this can either be the latest successful build that ran for the same branch on which the task is currently running (e.g., you run a build as part of PR 21; BQC looks for the latest successful build that ran for branch refs/pull/21/merge
) or the latest successful build for a specific branch. While the first option is the default, the second one can be configured by setting the baseBranchRef
parameter to a fixed value (e.g., refs/heads/develop
). For PR scenarios, it is useful to set baseBranchRef
to the variable $(System.PullRequest.TargetBranch)
to ensure that policies always compare with the latest merged in changes to the PR target branch. If you use the variable outside a PR, the task automatically falls back to the default behavior of comparing with a build for the current branch.
Thanks @ReneSchumacher for your prompt reply. baseBranchRef
is exactly what we wanted.
Describe the context
Describe the problem and expected behavior I am intending to use
Force Coverage Improvement
to improve coverage over time. This coverage improvement is based on subsequent builds while I want the coverage improvement against a branch ( e.g., develop). If I use this feature enabled - the build works fine If I added new unit tests. In practice you update the PR addressing reviewers comment. Once you do that: coverage is compared against your last build, and if new units are not added in each update - pipeline will fail.