Closed sailod closed 7 months ago
Hi, thanks for contributing. Could you please explain further what you're trying to achieve with this PR?
To make the call more explicit, using this helps understand better where it comes from
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 13:58 Mike-Gibson @.***> wrote:
Hi, thanks for controbuting. Could you please explain further what you're trying to achieve with this PR?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Mike-Gibson/mock-apollo-client/pull/54#issuecomment-1706050298, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJPXXETSM5WI2SBDMS5KJ5DXY3ESBANCNFSM6AAAAAA4LG7VJY . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Apologies @sailod , but I still don't understand how this change could make it 'more explicit'. And I'm not sure what you are referring to when you say 'better where it comes from'. Could you give an example of what is more explicit/better to understand after the change? Is it something to do with debugging, stack straces, or just code readability?
I can see the build is failing as the change has introduced a syntax error.
I'm going to close this as there hasn't been a reply. Feel free to add more info and we can re-open.
make it more clear where the variable is coming from