Closed systemcrash closed 1 year ago
SVCB RRs are normally used with underscore prefix owner names, so this example would probably need more changes. However, the text of this draft is currently frozen, as it has passed to the RFC Editor, so we're not accepting new PRs at this time.
Really? The example in 2.3 indicates it's OK.
svc4.example.net. 7200 IN SVCB 3 svc4.example.net. (
alpn="bar" port="8004" ech="..." )
Yes, it is allowed, but prefixes are generally required for the "initial" owner name (i.e. the initial QNAME). Further down the alias chain, they are not required.
When discussing implications of ServiceMode for SVCB RRs, it is confusing to use an example with HTTPS RRs without SVCB RRs. Change to SVCB RRs.