Closed legwinskij closed 1 year ago
Hi @legwinskij. Thanks for raising the issue. I'm glad to know that you find this library useful!
This is actually quite a good idea. I'll think about implementation of this feature.
Hi @MikhailKravets thanks for feedback, would you be ok if I try the implementation in a branch and send you pull request for review? I just thought I could help the community as well! But I don't want to push you :).
@legwinskij, of course! It'll be much appreciated. There is no PR policy yet 😬 please follow these standard rules for now:
release/1.2.0
branchMany thanks 🚀
@MikhailKravets thanks! I've tried something, please let me know what you think :).
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. First of all, thank you very much for this great plugin! Just one question, I use GitLab for some of the projects, and GitLab supports inline plantuml rendering natively throughout the whole website. Only issue is that their integration looks for keyword
plantuml
instead ofpuml
.Describe the solution you'd like Would it be possible to extend configuration for customisable keyword within
mkdocs.yml
? e.g. something like this:Describe alternatives you've considered Switch from
puml
keyword toplantuml
, but that could break backwards compatibility, and having this configurable might be bulletproof going forward, these "flavored" Markdowns are not standardized per se.