search

MillenniumDB / WDBench

Benchmark resources
10 stars 5 forks source link

Missing script #1

Closed ate47 closed 1 year ago

ate47 commented 1 year ago

Hi,

in the README, we can read:

The script to generate these data from the original data is in our source folder.

But when we click on the "source folder" link, the script isn't in the source folder (404)

I've searched in the commits and I wasn't able to find the script. The dataset can be downloaded easily, but it would be interesting to see the script

DomagojVrgoc commented 1 year ago

Hi Antoine.

Good catch.

This comes from an old benchmark, and the folder wasn't copied correctly. You can find the script here: https://github.com/MillenniumDB/benchmark/blob/master/src/database_generation/filter_direct_properties.py

However, please let me track the latest version we have on the server where the experiments were run, because I believe there was an extra filter.

If in a rush you can just use this one. If not, we will upload the most up to date one later today (it might actually be this one).

Best, Domagoj.

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 10:21, Antoine Willerval @.***> wrote:

Hi,

in the README, we can read:

The script to generate these data from the original data https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_download is in our source folder https://github.com/MillenniumDB/WDBench/blob/master/src/database_generation/filter_direct_properties.py .

But when we click on the "source folder" link, the script isn't in the source folder (404)

I've searched in the commits and I wasn't able to find the script. The dataset can be downloaded easily, but it would be interesting to see the script

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MillenniumDB/WDBench/issues/1, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACROY4UHEDNMOQ4VOLKNH7TWUI623ANCNFSM6AAAAAAUHIUKH4 . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

cirojas commented 1 year ago

The script we used is the same @DomagojVrgoc said. Now it has been added to this repository and the README is updated.

Thanks for opening this issue @ate47

ate47 commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the answer!

I was curious about the small size of the dataset, but I had forgotten that the rdfs:label and schema:description aren't converted like the rdfs:type in WD.