search

MinimallyCorrect / TickThreading

Historical multi-threaded minecraft by @LunNova. Performance over correctness. What could go wrong? Way too much.
https://jenkins.nallar.me/job/TickThreading/
MIT License
143 stars 43 forks source link

Is 1.7.10 still an option? #1255

Closed tenten8401 closed 8 years ago

tenten8401 commented 8 years ago

A lot of the modded servers are still running on 1.7.10 and it would be absolutely wonderful if you could give this a backport to 1.7.10 as that version completely missed out.

Glad your back by the way!

LunNova commented 8 years ago

See discussion under #1249 and #1248

tenten8401 commented 8 years ago

That's just sad. Can't wait until my favorite mods go to 1.8.9

-Isaac On 7/2/2016 9:19:10 PM, Ross Allan notifications@github.com wrote: See discussion under #1249 [https://github.com/nallar/TickThreading/issues/1249] and #1248 [https://github.com/nallar/TickThreading/issues/1248] — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [https://github.com/nallar/TickThreading/issues/1255#issuecomment-230129979], or mute the thread [https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AF42h6cnH-AYpQBpnTygXLSOogKT7T3mks5qRw4OgaJpZM4JDx1E].

tenten8401 commented 8 years ago

May I just point this out. 1.2k mods vs 47. http://modlist.mcf.li/version/1.7.10 http://modlist.mcf.li/version/1.8.9

ghost commented 8 years ago

Number of mods for a specific version of Minecraft should never be the determining factor for which version of the Forge API you build a new piece of software for. All in all, stick to the past for to long and you're bound to be in a situation where nothing progresses at all.