search

Mirascope / mirascope

LLM abstractions that aren't obstructions
http://mirascope.com/
MIT License
757 stars 50 forks source link

Improve type safety for client arguments in setup_call functions #607

Closed koxudaxi closed 1 month ago

koxudaxi commented 1 month ago

Related Issues: https://github.com/Mirascope/mirascope/issues/513, #519

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (142ef34) to head (51ccad4). Report is 12 commits behind head on release/v1.4.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## release/v1.4 #607 +/- ## ============================================== Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ============================================== Files 350 350 Lines 10455 10471 +16 ============================================== + Hits 10455 10471 +16 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Mirascope/mirascope/pull/607/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Mirascope) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Mirascope/mirascope/pull/607/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Mirascope) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Mirascope#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.